Price said the measure is intended to ensure city facilities remain "safe, professional and trustworthy."
Under the proposal, alcoholic beverages would be prohibited from being possessed, stored, served, distributed, or consumed in any building, office, facility, vehicle, or property owned, leased, or operated by the City of Pottsville. The ordinance would allow exceptions for special public events specifically authorized by city council.
The proposal prompted a response from Mayor Tom Smith, who acknowledged that he keeps beer in a refrigerator outside his office but rejected suggestions that alcohol is being improperly consumed at City Hall.
Smith said he purchased four cases of Yuengling beer in mid-January and noted that approximately three and a half cases remain six months later.
"Employees are not drinking alcohol during business hours," Smith said, adding that no after-hours parties have taken place.
The mayor said he believes it is appropriate to offer food and beverages to visiting guests and dignitaries, including mayors from neighboring communities.
"I should be able to welcome and offer guests some food, aging beverage when they visit our city," Smith said.
Smith also expressed concerns that the ordinance could send the wrong message about the city's relationship with D.G. Yuengling & Son, which he described as one of Pottsville's largest supporters. He further questioned whether the proposal could affect events held at locations such as the John F. Kennedy Memorial Pool and the Capitol Street parking garage.
Price countered the mayor's concerns by pointing out that the proposed ordinance already contains language allowing council-approved exceptions for public events. He also criticized Smith for reading what he described as a prepared statement sent to him by text message rather than engaging in a more natural discussion.
Despite the criticism, Smith reiterated that alcohol was not being consumed during the workday.
"Not once did I say there was any day drinking. I said that was no day drinking here at all," the mayor said.
No action was taken on the proposed ordinance Monday, and further discussion is expected before any vote is held.